美国-西方的宣传已经影响了我们对阿富汗的集体理解长达二十年之久，而且如此强大，以至于我们对导致塔利班迅速接管的动态一无所知。
For twenty years, two dominant narratives have shaped our view of the illegal US invasion and occupation of Afghanistan, and neither one of these narratives would readily accept the use of such terms as ‘illegal’, ‘invasion’ and ‘occupation.’ The framing of the US ‘military intervention’ in Afghanistan,
随着鳄鱼眼泪的海啸席卷西方政客，历史被压制。一代多以前，阿富汗赢得了自由，而美国、英国及其“盟友”摧毁了自由。 […]
As a tsunami of crocodile tears engulfs Western politicians, history is suppressed. More than a generation ago, Afghanistan won its freedom, which the United States, Britain and their “allies” destroyed. In 1978, a liberation movement led by the People’s Democratic Party of Afghanistan (PDPA) overthrew the dictatorship of Mohammad Dawd, the
美国未来可能不会在阿富汗境内有实体存在，但担心其经济制裁最终可能比其武装部队更致命。
WASHINGTON -- In keeping with President Joe Biden’s pledge to withdraw from America’s 20-year war in one of the poorest countries on earth, the U.S. government has yet to present any plan for future relations with Afghanistan, as it is reportedly scrambling to freeze Kabul’s wealth for fears of it falling into the hands of the Taliban. In the
李·坎普说，这次和平在阿富汗的最新时间似乎是极其荒谬，可笑的糟糕时机。
This is not a column defending Donald Trump. Across my career, I have said more positive words about the scolex family of intestinal tapeworms than I have said about Donald Trump. (Scolex have been shown to read more.) No, this is a column about context. When The New York Times reports anonymous sources from the intelligence community say
像之前的其他丑闻一样，最新的丑闻是基于匿名官员的不充分证词，并且已经将对美国外交政策的自由主义意见推向了更为鹰派的方向。
Based on anonymous intelligence sources, The New York Times,
America’s relationship with the Taliban has always been determined by how useful they are at advancing US interests in the region and the Trump administration’s recent efforts to make “peace” with the group are no exception.
President Trump, who is up for re-election this year, has added another “peace” deal to his credentials, a deal that the president, his re-election campaign and his supporters have promoted as proof that Trump is willing and able to resist the U.S. foreign policy establishment and its ceaseless push to keep the U.S. embroiled in “forever
