“如果以石油和影响力为重，那么似乎是中国而不是美国最终赢得了伊拉克战争及其后果-从来没有开枪。” -贾米尔·安德利尼（Jamil Anderlini）
A much anticipated American foreign policy move under the Biden Administration on how to counter China’s unhindered economic growth and political ambitions came in the form of a virtual summit on March 12, linking,
在以色列军队的夜间突袭和镇压以及分裂的法塔赫运动中的政治阴谋之间，有人想知道，如果举行选举，是否最终将使巴勒斯坦人在反对以色列占领的斗争中建立统一战线。
Many Palestinian intellectuals and political analysts find themselves in the unenviable position of having to declare a stance on whether they support or reject upcoming Palestinian elections which are scheduled for May 22 and July 30. But there are no easy answers. The long-awaited decree by Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas last
即使拜登能够克服军方，中央情报局和国会的要求关闭关塔那摩的压力，正义仍将不存在，这不仅是因为无数的生命被永远粉碎了，而且因为美国仍然拒绝向其学习错误。
Washington -- “That's certainly our goal and our intention.” This was the non-committal answer given by White House Press Secretary, Jen Psaki, when, on February 12, she was asked by a reporter whether the new Joe Biden administration intends
随着莫斯科继续巩固其在中东的存在，哈马斯看到了难得的摆脱美国-以色列强加孤立的机会。
On February 4, representatives from the Palestinian Movement, Hamas, visited Moscow to inform the Russian government of the latest development on the unity talks between the Islamic Movement and its Palestinian counterparts, especially Fatah. This was not the first time
特朗普，庞培和其他共和党人的外交政策议程容易被抹煞，因为他们的进取，轻蔑的言语和行动无疑是令人反感的。但是，民主话语不能轻易受到谴责，
There are obvious differences in the Democrats’ approach to the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, but only in semantics and political jingoism, not policy. This assertion can be justified if the Democratic administration’s official language on Palestine and Israel is examined, and such language considered within the context of
杨扬的亲以色列逻辑不仅没有根据，而且也令人困惑。
Claims made by Democratic New York City mayoral candidate, Andrew Yang, in a recent op-ed in the Jewish
政治混乱和社会分歧越扩大，例外主义的概念就越容易被暴露为怪异，自私和不可持续的。
History is being written in the United States today. Even the most pessimistic about the prospects of American democracy have rarely ventured out this far while offering a bleak analysis of America’s future, whether in terms of political polarization at home or global standing abroad.
As shocking and, certainly, telling 
