一种疾病已经感染了美国政治。这种弊病确实影响了两党人民，而对种族隔离以色列的支持——这意味着每年为其提供数十亿美元的资金——几乎跨越了所有政治分歧。
Democratic New York Rep. Hakeem Jeffries is visiting Israel as part of a congressional delegation that he is leading as these words are being written. Despite what is sure to be a busy schedule, Jeffries found the time to record a video that was posted on AIPAC’s Youtube channel. In it, he says that the congressional delegation is there to
美国与特拉维夫所谓的“牢不可破的联系”正在动摇，尽管更多的是语言而非行动。
Though the United States remains a strong supporter of Israel, there are some indications that the supposed 'unbreakable bond' with Tel Aviv is faltering, though more in language than in deeds. Following the provocative ‘Flag March’ on May 18, which is carried out annually by Israeli Jewish extremists in the Occupied Palestinian city of East
克里斯·赫奇 (Chris Hedges) 谈到民主党人如何将自己的灵魂出卖给企业捐助者，并推而广之，卖给强大的武器制造商和战争鹰派。
PRINCETON, NEW JERSEY (Scheerpost) — The Democrats position themselves as the party of virtue, cloaking their support for the war industry in moral language stretching back to Korea and Vietnam, when President Ngo Dinh Diem was as lionized as Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. All the wars they support and fund are “good” wars. All the enemies
国会为避免铁路工会罢工而迅速通过的立法，在两个执政党对工人阶级发动的长达数十年的战争中又一击。
PRINCETON, NEW JERSEY (Scheerpost) —The Congressional decision to prohibit railroad workers from going on strike and force them to accept a contract that meets few of their demands is part of the class war that has defined American politics for decades. The two ruling political parties differ only in rhetoric. They are bonded in their determination
就像朱利安·阿桑奇一样，格伦·格林沃尔德在特朗普之后才开始受到自由主义者的谴责。对唐纳德特朗普的自由主义发自内心的仇恨已经战胜了理性的话语。
Caitlin Johnstone asserts that “[t]he most significant political moment in the U.S. since 9/11 and its aftermath was when liberal institutions decided that Trump's 2016 election wasn't a failure of status quo politics but a failure of information control.” Since Trump’s election, information control contributes to why those critical of Democrats
特朗普，庞培和其他共和党人的外交政策议程容易被抹煞，因为他们的进取，轻蔑的言语和行动无疑是令人反感的。但是，民主话语不能轻易受到谴责，
There are obvious differences in the Democrats’ approach to the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, but only in semantics and political jingoism, not policy. This assertion can be justified if the Democratic administration’s official language on Palestine and Israel is examined, and such language considered within the context of practical policies on the
