• 支持MPN
Logo Logo
  • 调查
  • 意见与分析
  • 卡通
  • 播客
  • 视频
  • 语言
    • English
    • русский
    • Español
    • اَلْعَرَبِيَّةُ
    • Français

Metadata Collection Reveals Personal Details, Rights Groups Assert

关注我们

  • Rokfin
  • Telegram
  • Rumble
  • Odysee
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
police
(AP/Nam Y. Huh)

“Metadata is not trivial,” Electronic Frontier Foundation legal fellow Andrew Crocker said Wednesday, announcing the filing of an amicus brief in Klayman v. Obama, the high-profile lawsuit challenging the National Security Agency’s program of mass surveillance.

The brief, filed jointly by the EFF and the American Civil Liberties Union, declares that “call records collected by the government are not just metadata — they are intimate portraits of the lives of millions of Americans.”

Larry Klayman, a conservative activist and founder of the political advocacy group Freedom Watch, filed his lawsuit against the NSA and President Obama in June, 2013. It alleges that the government is conducting a “secret and illegal government scheme to intercept vast quantities of domestic telephonic communications,” in violation of the First, Fourth, and Fifth Amendments.

In December, Richard J. Leon of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia issued a preliminary ruling that the program was likely unconstitutional, in violation of the right against unreasonable search or seizure under the Fourth Amendment; the case is currently on appeal before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. In his ruling, Leon wrote: “I cannot imagine a more ‘indiscriminate’ and ‘arbitrary invasion’ than this systematic and high-tech collection and retention of personal data on virtually every single citizen for purposes of querying it and analyzing it without judicial approval.”

In their brief, the EFF and ACLU are equally harsh, asserting that changes in technology, as well as the government’s move from targeted to mass surveillance of American citizens, mean that previous legal decisions that the government relies on to justify its spying program do not apply.

Government officials have claimed the nature of the data collected is innocuous — Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) has said “[T]his is just metadata. There is no content involved.” But the rights organizations say those claims are spurious:

A call to a hotline or another type of dedicated, single-purpose phone line provides perhaps the starkest demonstration of this power. An hour-long call at 3 A.M. to a suicide prevention hotline; a thirty-minute call to an alcohol addiction hotline on New Year’s Eve; or a fifteen-minute call to a phone-sex service—the “metadata” from those calls, even in the absence of the “content” of the conversation, still reveals information that virtually anyone would consider exceptionally private.

In fact, the “vast” quantity of metadata the government collects, the duration for which it does so, and the modern nature of people’s phone use, means that such dragnet surveillance “provides a window into the thoughts, beliefs, traits, habits, and associations of millions of Americans,” the brief reads. “The Court should reject any contrary suggestion. Given the detailed portrait that can be drawn from metadata alone — and given the especially revealing nature of large quantities of metadata — the collection of this sensitive information receives the highest protection of the Fourth Amendment.”

Oral arguments for the case will take place November 4, 2014.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License
This article was published by Common Dreams.
Comments
22 8 月, 2014
Deirdre Fulton

What’s Hot

国际足联筹备2025年世俱杯之际,球迷要求向以色列出示红牌

膝盖骨与以色列游说团体:一支叛军如何震撼英国

从媒体宠儿到不受欢迎的人:格蕾塔·通贝里的心路历程

揭露:欧盟国家谴责加沙种族灭绝,秘密与以色列签署数十亿美元武器交易

英国巴勒斯坦团结运动官员承认与前以色列间谍合作

  • 联系我们
  • Archives
  • About Us
  • 隐私政策
© 2025 MintPress News