• 支持MPN
Logo Logo
  • 调查
  • 意见与分析
  • 卡通
  • 播客
  • 视频
  • 语言
    • English
    • русский
    • Español
    • اَلْعَرَبِيَّةُ
    • Français
Pfizer products are displayed at the Pfizer plant in Montreal, Thursday, July 12, 2012. Pfizer Canada announced a major investment in its Pfizer Global Supply (PGS) Montreal manufacturing facility, representing a financial commitment of $31.7 million to upgrade technology and increase capacity to accommodate growth from new export mandates. (AP Photo/The Canadian Press, Graham Hughes)

Corporations’ ‘Trade Secrets’ Trump Public Health

关注我们

  • Rokfin
  • Telegram
  • Rumble
  • Odysee
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
Pfizer products are displayed at the Pfizer plant in Montreal, Thursday, July 12, 2012. Pfizer Canada announced a major investment in its Pfizer Global Supply (PGS) Montreal manufacturing facility, representing a financial commitment of $31.7 million to upgrade technology and increase capacity to accommodate growth from new export mandates. (AP Photo/The Canadian Press, Graham Hughes)
Pfizer products are displayed at the Pfizer plant in Montreal, Thursday, July 12, 2012. (AP Photo/The Canadian Press, Graham Hughes)

Corporate power seems to be thwarting the public’s right to know if the personal care products they use contain potentially harmful ingredients.

As a result of the California Safe Cosmetics Act, the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) earlier this month rolled out a searchable database through which consumers could see if their personal care products contain carcinogens or reproductive toxins.

Yet an analysis of the database conducted by Women’s Voices for the Earth, an organization working to eliminate the toxic chemicals that harm public health and communities, revealed this week that 22 companies are requesting trade secret status for nearly 1,500 products, exploiting a loophole that allows them to keep the ingredients hidden from consumers.

Consumers searching the database may see “trade secret” listed for an ingredient instead of a chemical, thereby preventing full disclosure.

Selsun Blue is one of the products that lists trade secret for an ingredient. (Photo: Retoxx/cc/flickr)
Selsun Blue is one of the products that lists trade secret for an ingredient. (Photo: Retoxx/cc/flickr)

One egregious example the analysis found was make-up and fragrance maker Shiseido, which claimed trade secret status on ingredients in almost 400 of their products. Indeed, if a user searches “trade secret” on the database, pages upon pages of Shiseido products appear.

Among the companies using the trade secret status are well-known names like the Colgate-Palmolive Company and the Dial Corporation, as well as the CHI Organics brand.

“Trade secret status should never be allowed to conceal harmful chemicals such as carcinogens or reproductive toxins from consumers,” said Erin Switalski, Executive Director of Women’s Voices for the Earth.

“We understand and respect the need for companies to have trade secret protections for the few select chemicals needed to a product’s competitive advantage, but we do not believe that these business needs should ever trump public health,” Switalski said.

The organization is urging consumers who use products made by the 22 companies to call them to ask why they are keeping this information from consumers.

This article first appeared on Common Dreams.

Comments
3 2 月, 2014
Andrea Germanos

What’s Hot

国际足联筹备2025年世俱杯之际,球迷要求向以色列出示红牌

膝盖骨与以色列游说团体:一支叛军如何震撼英国

从媒体宠儿到不受欢迎的人:格蕾塔·通贝里的心路历程

揭露:欧盟国家谴责加沙种族灭绝,秘密与以色列签署数十亿美元武器交易

英国巴勒斯坦团结运动官员承认与前以色列间谍合作

  • 联系我们
  • Archives
  • About Us
  • 隐私政策
© 2025 MintPress News