• 支持MPN
Logo Logo
  • 调查
  • 意见与分析
  • 卡通
  • 播客
  • 视频
  • 语言
    • English
    • русский
    • Español
    • اَلْعَرَبِيَّةُ
    • Français
BC EU Germany Muslim Streetwear

A Step Toward Progress: Supreme Court Rules Against Abercrombie In Hijab Case

关注我们

  • Rokfin
  • Telegram
  • Rumble
  • Odysee
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • YouTube

BC EU Germany Muslim Streetwear


(ANTIMEDIA) Back in 2008, Samantha Elauf was denied employment at an Abercrombie and Fitch store in Oklahoma on the basis that she wears a hijab, or headscarf worn for religious (Islamic) purposes.

Elauf brought this case to the attention of CAIR (Council on American Islamic Relations), which then took it to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. The EEOC proceeded to file a lawsuit with the Supreme Court.

The Supreme Court’s ruling on this case came on Monday, deciding in favor of Elauf and against Abercrombie by an 8-to-1 vote. The 1964 Civil Rights Act was the legal precedent that helped the EEOC and Elauf win.

As Al Jazeera explained,“The legal question before the court was whether Elauf was required to ask for a religious accommodation in order for the company to be sued under the 1964 Civil Rights Act, which, among other things, bans employment discrimination based on religious beliefs and practices.”

With Islamophobia proving to be alive and well in America, it’s crucial to protect the freedoms of those who are constantly being subjected to discrimination. The ruling serves as a small victory for Muslim-Americans. We still have a long way to go, but it is a step toward progress, nonetheless.


This article is free and open source. You have permission to republish this article under a Creative Commons license with attribution to the author and TheAntiMedia.org.
Comments
5 6 月, 2015
Sydney Barakat | AntiMedia

What’s Hot

种族隔离的呼声:以色列如何利用性来粉饰种族灭绝

以色列最大的美国捐助者现在拥有哥伦比亚广播公司

80年的谎言:美国终于承认它知道不需要轰炸广岛和长崎

中情局建了数百个隐蔽网站,揭秘它们隐藏的内容

GAMAAN:民意调查让西方对伊朗的看法发生改变

  • 联系我们
  • Archives
  • About Us
  • 隐私政策
© 2025 MintPress News