Billionaire New York businessman Michael Bloomberg was a late arrival to the 2020 Democratic presidential nomination race, but he has certainly already made an impact. Spending $327 million on TV advertising alone, the former mayor has jumped into
对同龄人修改过的科学论文的分析得出了压倒性的共识，即结论是，全民医疗保险确实可以为美国纳税人省钱。
91 percent of all peer-reviewed scientific articles find that a single payer healthcare system like Medicare for All would save the country money, according to a meta analysis released Wednesday. The study, published in the influential open
私有化的，营利性的医疗保健行业几乎对其他先进国家的国有化体系感到恐慌。
Healthcare corporations are spending millions of dollars on astroturfed attack ads against Medicare for All. The Partnership for America’s Healthcare Future, for example, a coalition of hospitals and insurance companies, has spent $1 million on a television campaign against changes to the current healthcare system they profit from. The
佩洛西（Pelosi）对诸如财产税或全民医疗保险（Medcare for All）的进步立法的反对并非基于对失去选票的务实担忧（相反的说法似乎是对的），而更多地取决于她作为美国首富之一的地位
Speaking at a roundtable of reporters and editors at business network Bloomberg November 1, Speaker Nancy Pelosi had a strong message for Bernie Sanders and other Presidential nomination hopefuls who endorse Medicare for All:
“现在他已经承认需要进行两次更正，他应该考虑他和其他正在研究这一问题的人是否理解为人人享有医疗保险的问题，以便将自己任命为事实检查员。”
After nearly three days of constant pressure, clear explanations of basic facts, and bit of healthy shaming, CNN's Jake Tapper
“如果地球上的每个主要国家都能保证所有人的医疗保健，并取得更好的健康结果，同时人均支出大大低于我们，那么任何人都认为美国不能这样做是荒谬的。”
If the billionaire Koch brothers really want to undermine the economic case for Medicare for All, they have a funny way of showing it. Judging by the
