• 支持MPN
Logo Logo
  • 调查
  • 意见与分析
  • 卡通
  • 播客
  • 视频
  • 语言
    • English
    • русский
    • Español
    • اَلْعَرَبِيَّةُ
    • Français
Former President Barack Obama pauses as he hosts a conversation on civic engagement and community organizing, April 24, 2017, at the University of Chicago. (AP/Charles Rex Arbogast)

Obama Under Fire For $400K Speech To Wall Street ‘Fat Cats’

关注我们

  • Rokfin
  • Telegram
  • Rumble
  • Odysee
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
Former President Barack Obama pauses as he hosts a conversation on civic engagement and community organizing, April 24, 2017, at the University of Chicago. (AP/Charles Rex Arbogast)
Former President Barack Obama pauses as he hosts a conversation on civic engagement and community organizing, April 24, 2017, at the University of Chicago. (AP/Charles Rex Arbogast)

Former President Barack Obama is garnering criticism for netting a whopping $400,000 for his first major speech since leaving office—a speech to Wall Street firm Cantor Fitzgerald, scheduled to take place in September.

Progressives were deeply disappointed by Obama’s approach to Wall Street during his presidency, and many are condemning his lucrative Wall Street speaking fee as an apparent retroactive reward for his administration’s soft stance toward the one percent.

While Obama railed against “fat cat bankers” on the campaign trail, during his tenure as president he oversaw the massive bailout for the firms responsible for the 2008 crisis, picked former Wall Street executives for his cabinet, and not a single banker went to jail.

As Aaron Blake writes in the Washington Post, there are many problems with the arrangement:

George W. Bush and Bill Clinton did this, too, as have Hillary Clinton, Ben Bernanke and Alan Greenspan. And the more that Wall Street firms give out-of-office presidents and big-name politicians these paydays, the more they become the norm. Other presidents will know that such payments are on the table, and it risks coloring their decisions with regard to Wall Street and special interests.

Which is already happening with Obama, retroactively.

“Whether fair or not, it’s not difficult to look at Wall Street paying $400,000 to Obama as a reward for [the lack of prosecutions for anybody involved in the financial crisis]. In that way, it’s tough on both precedent and Obama’s presidency,” Blake observes.

Blake and others also point out that Obama himself criticized such arrangements in his 2006 book The Audacity of Hope:

Almost as though Obama explained himself why giving $$$ speeches to banksters is bad https://t.co/IT5RnyawaT

— Jonathan 'Boo and Vote' Cohn (@JonathanCohn) April 26, 2017

Moreover, observers note that at a time when Democrats are framing President Donald Trump as an enemy of working people, it seems as though the party wouldn’t want the former Democratic president to receive such stunning speaking fees from Wall Street. Indeed, right-wing outlet Fox News appeared to jump at the chance to describe the fee as a “huge payday” for Obama.

Many journalists and commentators also took to Twitter to condemn the speech:

https://twitter.com/samknight1/status/857213294024806400

Since leaving office, Obama has:

-Gone yachting with R. Branson
-Endorsed an investment banker in France
-Taken 400K for a Wall St speech

— Luke Savage (@LukewSavage) April 25, 2017

This is what Obama said literally the same day his $400K Wall Street speech was revealed. The, er, um … audacity pic.twitter.com/P3hTwOPZ6j

— Jeff Stein (@JStein_WaPo) April 25, 2017


This work by --- is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.This work by Common Dreams is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 International License.

 

Comments
26 4 月, 2017
Nika Knight

What’s Hot

渗透:犹太复国主义运动的主要功能

从革命到复兴:拉塞尔·布兰德拥抱特朗普和以色列

中央情报局、摩萨德和爱泼斯坦:揭开麦克斯韦家族的情报关系

种族隔离的呼声:以色列如何利用性来粉饰种族灭绝

以色列最大的美国捐助者现在拥有哥伦比亚广播公司

  • 联系我们
  • Archives
  • About Us
  • 隐私政策
© 2025 MintPress News