• 支持MPN
Logo Logo
  • 调查
  • 意见与分析
  • 卡通
  • 播客
  • 视频
  • 语言
    • English
    • русский
    • Español
    • اَلْعَرَبِيَّةُ
    • Français

Nuclear Experts Raise Concerns Over Giant ‘Ice Wall’ At Fukushima

关注我们

  • Rokfin
  • Telegram
  • Rumble
  • Odysee
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe, third right, wearing a red helmet, is briefed about tanks containing radioactive water by Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant chief Akira Ono, fourth right, during his inspection tour to the tsunami-crippled plant in Okuma, Fukushima Prefecture, northeastern Japan, Thursday, Sept. 19, 2013. During his three-hour tour, Abe was shown some of the 1,000 tanks containing radioactive water, a water treatment equipment and a chemical dam being installed along the coast — steps meant to contain the radiation-contaminated water leakage. (AP Photo/Japan Pool)  JAPAN OUT
Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe, third right, wearing a red helmet, is briefed about tanks containing radioactive water by Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant chief Akira Ono, fourth right, during his inspection tour to the tsunami-crippled plant in Okuma, Fukushima Prefecture, northeastern Japan, Thursday, Sept. 19, 2013. (AP Photo/Japan Pool) JAPAN OUT

Nuclear experts are casting doubt on Japan’s plans to build a giant underground “ice wall” surrounding the crippled Fukushima Daiichi nuclear facility in a bid to stop dangerous radiation leaks.

The roughly $320 million ice wall would theoretically function like an underground dam to stop groundwater from seeping into the facility where it becomes contaminated with radioactivity.

One of those questioning the ice wall is Dale Klein, former U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Chairman and current head of the Nuclear Reform Monitoring Committee hired by plant operator TEPCO.

“I’m not convinced that the freeze wall is the best option,” he told Kyodo News. “What I’m concerned about is unintended consequences.”

“Where does that water go and what are the consequences of that? I think they need more testing and more analysis,” Klein said.

Toyoshi Fuketa, a commissioner with Japan’s Nuclear Regulation Authority voiced concerns as well, saying at a Friday meeting in Tokyo, “We need to know if a frozen wall is really effective, and more importantly, we need to know whether a frozen wall may cause any trouble.”

Shortly after Japan announced the ice wall plans last year, Arjun Makhijani, a nuclear fusion expert and president of the Institute for Energy and Environmental Research, warned that nothing like this on this scale had been tried before, and called it

a risky experiment, because if the power fails, you know, just like if your — when the power goes out with your refrigerator, everything will de-freeze in — defrost in the freezer.

So, if this ice melts suddenly and it’s blocking an enormous amount of contaminated water behind it, then you have got a problem. At the same time, you know, the tanks are themselves something of a threat, if there’s another earthquake and this highly contaminated water gets into the ocean. And so they have a got a very — couple of very, very serious problems of containing the water.

Despite the ongoing crisis, plant operator TEPCO recently reported $4.3 billion in annual net profits thanks in part to a massive public bailout.

 

This article originally appeared in Common Dreams.

Comments
5 5 月, 2014
Andrea Germanos

What’s Hot

从革命到复兴:拉塞尔·布兰德拥抱特朗普和以色列

中央情报局、摩萨德和爱泼斯坦:揭开麦克斯韦家族的情报关系

种族隔离的呼声:以色列如何利用性来粉饰种族灭绝

以色列最大的美国捐助者现在拥有哥伦比亚广播公司

80年的谎言:美国终于承认它知道不需要轰炸广岛和长崎

  • 联系我们
  • Archives
  • About Us
  • 隐私政策
© 2025 MintPress News